By Ruth Daly
In this, the first of
my monthly blog posts for ROI Against Racism, I want to discuss the language of
everyday racism in Ireland and beyond.
It is easy to recognise and call people out on overt racist behaviour –
we see videos popping up on social media every day capturing racist attacks on
public transport. Just last week in
Ireland, a 19 year old was sentenced to 18 months in prison for a vicious
racist assault on two teenage cousins.
The assault, which took place in 2013, has left one of the young victims
blind in one eye, and both young men have talked about the devastating
emotional consequences of the violent racist attack they were subjected
to. While people are quick to condemn
such overt racist assaults, many choose to overlook the more subtle, everyday
forms of racism that are often presented in the guise of a joke or stereotype
of some description.
It is imperative that
we recognise that language is not simply a means of communication. Rather, it
is fundamental to everything we do, essentially housing the value through which
we live our lives, a theory proffered by many critics. It’s particularly worrying that a most
insidious form of racist behaviour has become so commonplace and normalised in
our society that prejudiced views and opinions are given the space to become
validated.
On a number of separate
occasions, I have found myself in the company of people who have prefaced a statement
with the words: ‘I’m not racist, but…’ what Sociologist Bonilla-Silva calls a
‘discursive buffer.’ He writes that this
use of language became ‘standard fare of post-Civil Rights racial
discourse.’ While the person uttering
this disclaimer might think themselves unprejudiced, this all-too-common use of
language is hugely problematic. For one
thing, these words carry with them inherently racist connotations. In my experience at least, the subsequent
remark is usually an explicitly racist or derogatory one. Ultimately, in using this ‘discursive buffer’
a person is both acknowledging that they are going to say something racist
while simultaneously absolving oneself of all responsibility in perpetuating
prejudiced rhetoric.
The idea that one can remove
any sense of accountability for one’s use of racist language with a trite
disclaimer is wholly unacceptable. It
illustrates the immense power of language as it points to the issue of a deeply
embedded racist discourse which is often accompanied by a tone of cultural
superiority. This of course leads us to another, huge, manifestation of racism,
white privilege (which I will discuss in a later blog) which proves rather
difficult as a point of discussion with someone who vehemently denies they
harbour racist views or behaviours. Lest
we forget, as long as someone proclaims that they are not racist first, they
can then make all manner of racist remarks.
So what can be done? If we refuse
to challenge the insidious, surreptitious everyday racism that has comfortably
settled itself into our everyday lives, are we complicit in acts of racism? I
would answer that with a resounding Yes! As Desmond Tutu puts it, ‘If you are
neutral in situations of injustice, you have chosen the side of the oppressor.
If an elephant has its foot on the tail of a mouse and you say that you are
neutral, the mouse will not appreciate your neutrality.’ We know that racism is by no means an
inherent thing, but rather, it is a learned behaviour. In educating ourselves about the deep-seated
nature of racial discourse, and our complicity in that discourse if we choose
to remain silent in the face of racism and prejudice, we can continue to work
towards an inclusive Ireland…
---------------------------------------
- Eduardo Bonilla-Silva, Racism Without Racists (Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield, 2009), p. 57.
- Ibid.